Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 12:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have heard it mentioned as an idea for many months now but never stated as a feature coming out. I for one would really like to see it happen. I believe CCP can learn from the leasons of T3 cruisers and make the roll out even better this time. Can we get any word on this please?
PS We are still waiting for covert cynos on Covert T3 cruisers  |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 13:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:Wheres the dislike button? I cant find it!
You have been waiting to get me back huh. Hehe, good show. Thanks for the bump! |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 13:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:there shouldnt be any other T3 ship type other than cruisers
ever
I am pretty sure worm hole people, new players, and other veterans would disagree with you. Thanks for your opinion though. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:Shepard Book wrote:Nirnias Stirrum wrote:Wheres the dislike button? I cant find it! You have been waiting to get me back huh. Hehe, good show. Thanks for the bump! Im not sure what your refering to to be honest with you :D Did you post in a topic i made at some stage? :P
I used same verbiage not to far back hehe
|

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Title is misleading...
We talking Tech 3 or Tier 3...never can be really sure anymore.
I am all for new ships and designs...especially of the Tech 3 kind because they are more customizable in designs making them a little more unique to each person. Sorta...
Unfortunately, introducing new ships for the sake of new ships is a bad idea. They need to have a purpose and a reason for existing first. After that I am all for it.
Yeah, Your right thanks and I will update it. Tech 3 all the way! |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lucas Schuyler wrote:The problem with new Tech 3 ships is you need a really good plan for their capabilities. Just taking T3 Cruisers and doing the same thing but in a smaller hull is kind of pointless.
What is going to be the role of these modular... destroyers?
From where I sit, Cruisers work because they are already a very generalist ship class, Combat ships, Recon Ships, Logistics, etc. Cruiser hulls were already used for a wide variety of purposes. The gold standard of general purpose.
Destroyers are an anti-frigate platform and for interdiction... That is not a lot to work with for a modular design.
And on the PVE side... what Destroyer can be expected to stand up to Sleepers? It really doesn't have the requisite PVE niche.
Good questions. I have seen quite a few ideas in the CSM and features areas that could be incorporated. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Hicksimus wrote:I would love to buy a covert nullified destroyer with a sig radius of 1 and 150k ehp. But I'm not sure that would be good for anything other than trolling.
Trolls gotta fly too hehe.
Interdictor along with stealth ships are my favorite ships TBH.
I am not sure I like the idea but a limited anti stealth destroyer is one idea for modular I could see working, Id like it to be a short range anti stealth bubble so it could still be countered though. Same size as current dictor bubble I think is a place for them but it should never make flying stealth obsolete. I believe we could take on the challenge as long as it is not grid wide. Maybe the same size as current bubbles could work though. I think it is important to remove local as an intel tool before any kind of counter or nerf to stealth comes in though.
Maybe even a mini command with one slot for a command module?
Id really like to see a T3 stealther dictor to be able to travel with Black Ops BS.
Just a few ideas. I am not claiming any as my own. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 21:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Michael1995 wrote:Last I heard the next shipment of T3 goodies would be coming out in 2013 at the earliest, unless things have changed.
Thanks for the heads up. I wish we could get some confirmation. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 22:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jayrendo Karr wrote:I despide Tech 3 cruisers and what they stand for. The tengu/loki/proteus all need nerfs, tbh the Legion is what tech 3's should be. Adaptable to an extent but against a ship fit for the same role it should be subpar.
I have the skills ( Mains ) for all of them but mainly I have flown the Loki so can't say from personal experience but the trolls seem to talk about tengu a lot.
|

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 22:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:can we please get a teir 2 destroyer before we even consider "TECH 3" destroyer here?
Interdictors fill that role I thought.
|

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 14:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Shepard Book wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:there shouldnt be any other T3 ship type other than cruisers
ever I am pretty sure worm hole people, new players, and other veterans would disagree with you. Thanks for your opinion though. no, more tier 3's would just obsolete even more ships, i eman, holy crap, think of the ridiculous amount fo DPS a NORMAL destroyer can get, now slap some T3 specialties on that mofo, you LITERALLY have an "i kill everything" ship.
Normal destroyers should be a stepping stone or do you not see that? T3 cruisers are not a kill everything ship so I do not see your point. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 14:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
MotherMoon wrote:the art for tech 3 frigates is rumored to be done, I'd like to see that. frigates as expensive as battleships, cool.
Id take either T3 frigates or destroyers really. I would prefer destroyers but eh |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 16:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Unfortunately, introducing new ships for the sake of new ships is a bad idea. They need to have a purpose and a reason for existing first. After that I am all for it.
Yup. T3 destroyers and frigates are the answer to a question nobody is asking.
My hope is they would add some new roles with T3 |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 16:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Unfortunately, introducing new ships for the sake of new ships is a bad idea. They need to have a purpose and a reason for existing first. After that I am all for it.
Yup. T3 destroyers and frigates are the answer to a question nobody is asking. My hope is they would add some new roles with T3
There are many modules that are just not used at smaller ship classes. Logistics comes to mind. Smart bombs, defender missiles Ect |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
53
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 17:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cloned S0ul wrote:No more ships unification, t3 cruisers are awesome, but meny other ship got less usage since CCP introduce t3 cruisers, you want kill all nice destroyers and interdictors, aslo i say no for t3 frigates, because we got a lot of specific roles small frigates, like assault ships, electronic frigates, interceptors even mining firgates.
Is really easy to add new ships, but is hard to balance them while we got a lot good old ships.
Do not forget tech 3 costs more and is skill intensive to fly too. I was all for slow roll out of tech 3 and not in all classes but that seems years ago. I think CCP can learn from last time and make them have an impact but t2 will still be viable. If you wanna spend less for t1 you'll be able to but it wont be as good. I do not see anything wrong with that.
|

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
54
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 22:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sunviking wrote:I thought I heard Soundwave mention 'Tech3 Destroyers' in that Ten Ton interview.
I may have misheard, but it seemed like he was dropping a pretty big hint that Tech 3 Destroyers are incoming.
Likewise
|

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
57
|
Posted - 2012.05.04 12:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sunviking wrote:In my mind, the best thing about Strategic Cruisers overall, is that you can fit them to fill the role of Logistics or Command Ship as part of a Black Ops fleet i.e. with a Cov Ops Cloak.
No Tech2 Ship can do that at the moment.
They still need to be able use use covert cynos IMO. |
|
|